Legal Opinion

Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Pierce

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 10, 1928No. 17345PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TEEHEE, C.

In the court below J. O. Pierce, plaintiff, in an action in tort, recovered a judgment of $875 by a jury verdict against the Magnolia Petroleum Company, defendant.

Plaintiff alleged that he suffered personal and property injuries through a collision of defendant’s automobile truck, negligently operated by Stanley Neiswander and Charley Cunningham, the agents and employees of defendant, with plaintiff’s buggy, in which he was traveling on a public highway in Pittsburg county.

Defendant denied the alleged relationship between it and Neiswander and Cunningham, and further interposed the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Singer Manufacturing Co. v. RahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Philadelphia & Reading Railroad v. DerbySupreme Court of the United States · 1853
  3. Railroad Company v. HanningSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  4. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. BennettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Standard Oil Co. v. ParkinsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Gulf Refining Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
  2. Texas Co. v. ZeiglerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1941
  3. Chatelain v. ThackerayUtah Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Shaver v. BellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Bieluczyk v. Crown Petroleum CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API