Legal Opinion

Hauf v. Life Extension Foundation

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided March 4, 2008No. 1:06-mj-00627PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JANET T. NEFF, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Virginia Hauf and Stephen (“Steve”) Barrow are mother and son who filed a seven-count complaint arising from the 2005 publication of Barrow’s cancer recovery story in the membership drive campaign materials disseminated by Life Extension Foundation (LEF). LEF moves for dismissal of Counts 1 through 4 and 7 as to Barrow and Counts 4 through 6 as to Hauf under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) (Dkt. 4). LEF founder William Faloon moves for dismissal under Rules 12(b)(6) and 12(b)(2) of Counts 1 through 5 against him (Dkt 13). For the reasons that follow,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Southern MacHine Company, Inc. v. Mohasco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
  5. Herman Theunissen and Ann Theunissen v. Sid Matthews D/B/A Matthews Lumber TransferCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re General Motors LLC Ignition Switch LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
  2. Stayart v. YAHOO! INC.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2009
  3. Armstrong v. Eagle Rock Entertainment, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009
  4. Hauf v. LIFE EXTENSION FOUNDATIONDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2009
  5. 3M Company v. Continental Diamond Tool CorpDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API