Legal Opinion
Herman Theunissen and Ann Theunissen v. Sid Matthews D/B/A Matthews Lumber Transfer
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 24, 1991No. 90-1647PublishedCited by 630 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CELEBREZZE, Senior Circuit Judge.
Herman and Ann Theunissen, Plaintiff-Appellants in this personal injury suit, appeal the district court’s dismissal of their action for lack of personal jurisdiction over Defendant-Appellee Sid Matthews, a Canadian lumber yard operator. On appeal, the Theunissens do not challenge the rules of law applied by the district court; indeed, they concede that the court accurately stated the substantive law governing the issue. Rather, they argue that in reaching its decision on the question of jurisdiction, the court below improperly decided disputed *1456questions of…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Data Disc, Incorporated v. Systems Technology Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by630 opinions
- Compuserve, Incorporated v. Richard S. Patterson, Individually, and Flashpoint DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Ticketmaster-New York, Inc. v. Joseph M. AliotoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Intera Corporation v. George Henderson IIICourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Air Products & Controls, Inc. v. Safetech International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Beverly Hills Fan Company v. Royal Sovereign Corp. And Ultec Enterprises Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
625 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.