Legal Opinion

Stayart v. YAHOO! INC.

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided August 28, 2009No. Case 09-C-116PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

RUDOLPH T. RANDA, Chief Judge.

The plaintiff, Beverly Stayart (“Stayart”), conducted search engine queries with her own name as a search term, and she didn’t like the results. Her queries produced links to pornographic websites, online pharmacies promoting sexual dysfunction drugs, and an adult-oriented online dating service. Stayart alleges that the defendants, Yahoo! Inc. (“Yahoo!”), Overture Services, Inc. (“Overture”), and Various, Inc. (‘Various”), knowingly and intentionally used her name on the internet without authorization. She brings three claims against each of the…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Tamayo v. BlagojevichCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  4. Amf Incorporated, a Corporation v. Sleekcraft Boats, a Sole Proprietorship, and Bruce E. Nescher, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  5. Lockheed Martin Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Network Solutions, Inc., Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. M.A. ex rel P.K. v. Village Voice Media Holdings, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2011
  2. Hart v. Amazon.com, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
  3. All Star Championship Racing, Inc. v. O'Reilly Automotive Stores, Inc.District Court, C.D. Illinois · 2013
  4. Estate of Barré v. CarterDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2017
  5. Maremont v. SUSAN FREDMAN DESIGN GROUP, LTD.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API