Legal Opinion
Phelps v. Loupias
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 4, 1950No. Civ. 14181PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGoodell, J.
Appellants sued Roger Loupias, Eli Rosen and several fictitious defendants for declaratory relief, to foreclose a chattel mortgage, and for damages arising from the alleged conversion of personal property. The court decided that the chattel mortgage held by appellants constituted no lien prior to that of defendant Rosen, and awarded judgment in favor of Rosen for his costs, and against Loupias for $12,000 and interest. This appeal followed.
A laundry business in San Francisco known as The Splendid French Laundry was, on November 2, 1946, owned solely by defendant Loupias. On that day a “joint…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Oakland Bank of Savings v. California Pressed Brick Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Guerin v. KirstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Pacific Finance Corp. v. HendleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Bice v. Harold L. Arnold, IncorporatedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Hougham v. RowlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Crestline Mobile Homes Manufacturing Co. v. Pacific Finance Corp.California Supreme Court · 1960
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. GilbertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- J. R. Townsend Co. v. New Hampshire Auto Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1962
- Williamson v. SkerrittMontana Supreme Court · 1963
- The Republic Supply Company of California v. W. A. MacMullen Trustee, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964