Legal Opinion
O'Toole v. Bd. of Trust. of SD Retirement
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided July 2, 2002No. NonePublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOVRIEN, Circuit Judge.
[¶ 1.] William and Elisabeth O’Toole (O’Tooles) appeal the circuit court’s judgment affirming the South Dakota Retirement System Board of Trustee’s (Board) determination that O’Tooles were not entitled to an additional refund for the employer contributions made on their behalf. We affirm.
FACTS
[¶2.] Elisabeth and William O’Toole were employed with state government until November 1 and August 23, 1996 (respectively). After leaving the state’s payroll each had five years to apply for a refund of the contributions they made to the South Dakota Retirement System (System).…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Permann v. South Dakota Department of Labor, Unemployment Insurance DivisionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Youst v. LongoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Ward v. LangeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Pickering v. Human Rights CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- Johnson v. KolmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re Elizabeth A. Briggs Revocable Living TrustSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- Martin v. American Colloid Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Knapp v. Hamm & Phillips Service Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Tracfone Wireless, Inc. v. South Dakota Department of Revenue & RegulationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Chilson v. Kimball School District No. 7-2South Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.