Legal Opinion
Knapp v. Hamm & Phillips Service Co.
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided November 28, 2012No. 26270PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEVERSON, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Erwin “Don” Knapp was injured on a job site while working in North Dakota for the North Dakota office of Hamm & Phillips Service Company. Knapp filed for and received benefits through North Dakota’s workers’ compensation agency, but after about nine months of benefits, he received a benefit denial notification from the agency. Knapp then filed a claim for workers’ compensation benefits in South Dakota. While awaiting adjudication of that claim, Knapp died of causes unrelated to his injury. His wife, Sharon Knapp, sought to substitute herself as a party in the South…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cardillo v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Permann v. South Dakota Department of Labor, Unemployment Insurance DivisionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Thomas v. Washington Gas Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Claim of Nashko v. Standard Water Proofing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1958
- Darling v. West River Masonry, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Winslow v. Fall River Cnty.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
- Mercer v. South Dakota Attorney General OfficeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Federal Insurance v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Tornow v. Sioux Falls Civil Service BoardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Anderson v. Tri State ConstructionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.