Legal Opinion

Chilson v. Kimball School District No. 7-2

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 2003No. NonePublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

[¶ 1.] Mark Chilson and Lonna Chilson appeal the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Kimball School District No. 7-2, Gary Heitz and Eileen Kroupa on the basis that the complaint was barred by the applicable statutes of limitations. We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

[¶ 2.] As this is a review of a summary judgment, we view the facts in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party. Mark Chilson was employed by the Kim-ball School District as a middle school teacher and an elementary school physical education instructor. He had been with the school district for approximately…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Nemazee v. Mt. Sinai Medical CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Greene v. Morgan, Theeler, Cogley & PetersenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Kurylas, Inc. v. BradskySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Gettysburg School District 53-1 v. LarsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Cox v. Sioux Falls School District 49-5South Dakota Supreme Court · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gul v. Center for Family MedicineSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Butler MacHinery Co. v. Morris Construction Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Gul v. Center for Family MedicineSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API