Legal Opinion

Foster v. State, Department of Transportation

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 2001No. S-9720PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

The superior court dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction Evelynn Foster's trespass claim against the State of Alaska. 1 Because adjudicating Foster's claim would have required the superior court to determine the scope of an easement on Foster's Native allotment, and because state courts lack jurisdiction to adjudicate the ownership or right to possession of Native allotment land, we affirm the dismissal of Foster's claim.

II FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

In 1961 the United States Bureau of Land Management (BLM) granted the State of Alaska a material…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Minnesota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. United States v. ClarkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Ryan Martin, by His Parents and Next Friends, Kim and Samuel Martin v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  4. Kellis v. CritesAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Boisclair v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jachetta v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. Cowan v. YeisleyAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Hawkins v. AttatayukAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Dias v. State, Department of Transportation & Public FacilitiesAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Pursche v. Matanuska-Susitna BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API