Legal Opinion
Boisclair v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
Decided December 17, 1990No. S008470PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOSK, J.
This is a petition for writ of mandate or prohibition after denial of motions to quash service of summons and to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction 1 in an action to determine easement rights or public rights to use a road.
Real party in interest Imperial Granite Company (hereafter Imperial), a corporation that mines and transports granite, contends that a dirt road running through Indian trust land is either a public road or a road over which it has easement rights. Petitioners (hereafter the Indian defendants), all members of the Pala Indian Tribe, contend that…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Worcester v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Trudgeon v. Fantasy Springs CasinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- FRIENDS OF EAST WILLITS VALLEY v. County of MendocinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Middletown Rancheria of Pomo Indians v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Jicarilla Apache Tribe v. Board of County CommissionersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.