Legal Opinion

Lalanne v. Lalanne

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 6, 1979No. 7915DC359PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Judge.

The judgment entered in this cause filed on 29 January 1979 must be revoked. Ordinarily, where a judgment is rendered in open court and some memorandum or minute of the note appears of record showing what the judgment is, formal judgment based thereon may be later entered. This rule does not apply to a con sent judgment, which requires the consent of the parties to subsist at the time it is signed in order to give the court jurisdiction. A consent judgment is not, strictly speaking, a judgment of the court, but is merely the contract of the parties entered upon the records of a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lee v. . RhodesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  2. State Highway Commission v. RowsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  3. Freedle v. MoorefieldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co., N.A. v. BounousCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  2. McIlroy Bank & Trust v. Acro Corp.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API