Legal Opinion

W.A. Krueger Co. v. Industrial Commission

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1986No. 18539-PRPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYS, Justice.

This petition for review arises from an opinion of the Court of Appeals affirming an award to Christopher J. Puma (respondent) by the Arizona Industrial Commission. W. A. Krueger Co. and Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York v. Industrial Commission of Arizona and Christopher J. Puma, 1 CA-IC 3261 (filed March 19, 1986). We accepted review and have jurisdiction pursuant to art. 6, § 5(3) of the Arizona Constitution, A.R.S. § 12-120.24, and Rule 23, Ariz.R.Civ.App.P., 17A A.R.S.

The facts are undisputed. On August 22, 1982, respondent herniated a cervical disc in a work-related…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Adams v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Gomez v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZONAArizona Supreme Court · 1986

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Gutierrez v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONAArizona Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Cassey v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
  3. Simpson v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  4. Slover Masonry, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Benafield v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API