Legal Opinion

Brown v. Marvin G.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 2004No. 29390PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TROUT, Chief Justice.

Appellants Josh and Nicole Robson (the Robsons) and Marvin and Lynette Miller (the Millers) appeal from the district judge’s determination that there is an easement by necessity and by prescription crossing over their respective properties, providing access to property owned by Don and Luaina Brown (the Browns). This Court affirms the trial court’s decision on easement by necessity, but remands the case for further proceedings.

I

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Prior to 1949, all of the property involved in this case, approximately 640 acres located in Jefferson County,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sun Valley Shopping Center, Inc. v. Idaho Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Edwards v. Conchemco, Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Bonz v. SudweeksIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Sun Valley Potatoes, Inc. v. Rosholt, Robertson & TuckerIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District v. Washington Federal SavingsIdaho Supreme Court · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Hughes v. George B. Fisher, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Beckstead v. PriceIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Jerry Machado v. Charles L. RyanIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Regan v. Pomerleau, DeForest Realty, Inc. and City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  5. Tomecek v. BavasMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API