Legal Opinion

Alaska Trademark Shellfish, LLC v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 2004No. S-10308PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRYNER, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

This case requires us to determine whether Alaska law gives shellfish farmers the exclusive right to harvest wild stocks already growing on their farm sites. Several applicants asked the Alaska Department of Fish and Game for aquatic farm permits allowing them to grow and commercially harvest geo-duck clams in Alaska waters. When the Department of Fish and Game declined to give them exclusive rights to the wild geo-ducks on their proposed farm sites, the applicants appealed to the superior court. The superior court upheld the department’s decision,…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Escambia County v. McMillanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. State v. AlexAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Ransom v. HanerAlaska Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Stordahl v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1977

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Premera Blue Cross v. State, Department of Commerce, Community & Economic Development, Division of InsuranceAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Alaska Civil Liberties Union v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Hymes v. DeRamusAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State, Department of Commerce, Community & Economic Development, Division of Insurance v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2011
  5. State v. SchmidtAlaska Supreme Court · 2014

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API