Legal Opinion
Hymes v. DeRamus
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided January 15, 2010No. S-12761PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CARPENETI, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
A prisoner and his wife, appearing pro se, brought a lawsuit against a Department of Corrections doctor and physician's assistant based on medical treatment the prisoner received while incarcerated at the Fairbanks Correctional Center. The superior court granted summary judgment to the doctor and physician's assistant because the prisoner did not exhaust his administrative remedies. The prisoner and his wife appeal this and several other actions by the superior court. Because at least one of the prisoner's malpractice claims may not have been subject…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Booth v. ChurnerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- McCarthy v. MadiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Breck v. UlmerAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Jennings v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- Brandon v. Corrections Corp. of AmericaAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Pravat P. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- Limeres v. LimeresAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
- Oels v. Anchorage Police Department Employees Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
- Philip J. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
- Smart v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.