Legal Opinion
Intransit, Inc. v. Excel North American Road Transport, Inc.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided March 7, 2006No. Civ. 05-3052-COPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HOGAN, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge John Cooney filed Findings and Recommendation on November 17, 2005, in the above entitled case. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.CivJP. 72(b). When either party objects to any portion of a magistrate judge’s Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the magistrate judge’s findings. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920, 102 S.Ct. 1277, 71…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc. v. Megatrux Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- Aculliance Holdings, Inc. v. BLS Logistics LLC, et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026
- Exel, Inc. v. Southern Refrigerated Transport, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2014
- Exel, Inc. v. Southern Refrigerated Transport, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2011
- Federal Insurance Company v. Royal Auto Trans Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.