Legal Opinion
Exel, Inc. v. Southern Refrigerated Transport, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided August 26, 2014No. Case No. 2:10-cv-994Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
JAMES L. GRAHAM, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment *738(docs. 93 and 97). For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS the Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 93) as to Count IV of the Complaint, DISMISSES Count III of the Complaint, and DENIES the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 97).
I. Background
The Plaintiff, Exel, Inc., is a freight broker that arranges for the transportation of commodities on behalf of its customers. The Defendant, Southern Refrigerated Transport, Inc. (SRT), is a motor carrier…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.