Legal Opinion

Exel, Inc. v. Southern Refrigerated Transport, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided December 15, 2011No. Case No. 2:10-CV-0994Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

JAMES L. GRAHAM, District Judge.

This case involves an interstate shipment of goods allegedly stolen or lost while in the custody of Defendant Southern Refrigerated Transport, Inc. (“SRT”). Pending before the court are SRT’s motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c) and SRT’s request for an oral hearing on its motion. As set forth below, the Court grants SRT’s motion for judgment on the pleadings and denies SRT’s request for oral hearing.

I. Background

Exel is a freight broker (or, in its estimation, a company that “makes arrangements…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Public Serv. Comm'n of Utah v. Wycoff Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API