Bejarano v. State
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Rose, C. J.:
In this appeal, we decide whether this court’s 2004 decision in McConnell v. State1 retroactively applies to appellant John *1070Bejarano’s final conviction and sentence of death. We hold that McConnell set forth a new rale of substantive law that must be given retroactive application.
Applying our holding to Bejarano’s case, we conclude that the robbery felony aggravator found by the jury is invalid pursuant to McConnell. Because the receiving-money aggravator also found by the jury was based on the robbery, it too is invalid. We strike them both and reweigh. After…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Nika v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2008
- Luurtsema v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- Castillo v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2019
- JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2016
- Rippo v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2006
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.