Rippo v. State
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*1090OPINION
By the Court,
Hardesty, J.:
This is an appeal from an order of the district court denying a post-conviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus in a death penalty case. Appellant Michael Rippo invokes this court’s holding in McConnell v. State that “it [is] impermissible under the United States and Nevada Constitutions to base an aggravating circumstance in a capital prosecution on the felony upon which a felony murder is predicated.”1 This court has concluded in Bejarano v. State2 that McConnell’s holding is retroactive; we therefore apply it here. Three of the aggravating…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Duren v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Mills v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Pellegrini v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Cary Williams v. Timothy FilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Nika v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2008
- Rippo v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2018
- Bejarano v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2006
- BARLOW (KEITH) v. STATE (DEATH PENALTY-DIRECT)Nevada Supreme Court · 2022
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.