Legal Opinion

Rippo v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 2006No. 44094PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1090OPINION

By the Court,

Hardesty, J.:

This is an appeal from an order of the district court denying a post-conviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus in a death penalty case. Appellant Michael Rippo invokes this court’s holding in McConnell v. State that “it [is] impermissible under the United States and Nevada Constitutions to base an aggravating circumstance in a capital prosecution on the felony upon which a felony murder is predicated.”1 This court has concluded in Bejarano v. State2 that McConnell’s holding is retroactive; we therefore apply it here. Three of the aggravating…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Duren v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Mills v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Pellegrini v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2001

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Cary Williams v. Timothy FilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  2. Nika v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Rippo v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Bejarano v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  5. BARLOW (KEITH) v. STATE (DEATH PENALTY-DIRECT)Nevada Supreme Court · 2022

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API