Legal Opinion

United States v. Gustav W. Skurdal

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 27, 2003No. 01-35959PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ALARCÓN, Circuit Judge.

Gustav W. Skurdal appeals from the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (“ § 2255”) motion to vacate, set aside or correct his conviction and sentence. We reverse. We conclude that Mr. Skurdal’s attorney’s failure to file a proper Anders brief in support of his motion to be relieved of his appointment to represent Mr. Skurdal on his direct appeal constituted a denial of effective assistance of counsel under the Fifth Amendment. Accordingly, we hold that Mr. Skurdal has demonstrated cause and prejudice for his failure to seek review of the issues presented in his § 2255…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Curtis Fauber v. Ronald DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
  2. Sanchez v. HedgpethDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2010
  3. United States v. Sanchez-GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. United States v. LamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. Anthony Pelayo v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2026

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API