Sanchez v. Hedgpeth
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
ANDREW J. GUILFORD, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all of the records and files herein, and the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. The time for filing Objections to the Report and Recommendation has passed and no Objections have been received. Accordingly, the Court accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
1. The Petition is DENIED and Judgment shall be entered…
2Cases cited135 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
130 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bridges v. BeardDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- Jorge Enrique Hernandez v. The Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2020
- People v. Macauley CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Sergio Barbosa v. M. McVayDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2025
- Silicon Valley Textiles, Inc. v. Sofari Collections Ltd.District Court, N.D. California · 2023