Legal Opinion
Michael Kent v. County of Oakland
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 6, 2016No. 14-2519PublishedCited by 118 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN TATENHOVE, D.J., delivered the opinion of the court in which MOORE, J., joined. SUHRHEINRICH, J. (pp. 398-403), delivered a separate dissenting opinion.
OPINION
GREGORY F. VAN TATENHOVE,' District Judge.
The events underlying this civil rights action alleging excessive force arose when *387Oakland County Sheriffs Deputies Claudio Lopez and Christina Maher responded to the natural, at-home death of Plaintiff Michael Kent’s father. Adamant that his father had not wished for life-sustaining procedures, Kent vehemently objected to emergency medical technicians’ efforts to attach an Automated…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Tennessee v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by118 opinions
- Monica Rogers v. Henry Ford Health Sys.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- Victor Smith v. City of Troy, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- Nancy Roell v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Comm'rsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- Salvatore Palma, Jr. v. Matthew JohnsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
- Estate of Hill ex rel. Hill v. MiracleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.