Legal Opinion
Victor Smith v. City of Troy, Ohio
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided November 1, 2017No. 16-4719PublishedCited by 125 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Victor L. Smith, represented by counsel, appeals the district court’s judgment granting summary judgment to the defendants on his claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Title II of the-Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12132. The parties have waived oral argument, and the panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a).
Smith has epilepsy, On the morning of February 11, 2014, he began experiencing a seizure while driving in Troy, Ohio. Smith steered his car into a yard located at 449 Glendale' Avenue, exited the car, and walked a few…
3Cases cited16 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by125 opinions
- Ali Pineda v. Hamilton Cty., OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Lamar Wright v. City of EuclidCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Will El v. City of PittsburghCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- Timothy Johnson v. Michael RogersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Salvatore Palma, Jr. v. Matthew JohnsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.