Legal Opinion

Carter Oil Co. v. Popp

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 30, 1918No. 9418PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error from District Court, Garfield County; James B. Cullison, Judge. Action by Phillip W. Popp and wife against the Carter Oil Company. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

PRYOR, O.

Tbis is an action commenced by Pbillip W. Popp and Mary E. Popp, defendants in error, against tbe Carter Oil Company, a corporation, plaintiff in error, to cancel a certain oil and gas mining lease on lands owned by tbe plaintiffs in error, lying in Garfield county,. Okla. On tbe 18tb day of March, 1916, tbe date of execution of tbe lease in question, tbe legal title to tbe premises was in tbe Oklahoma State Bank of Enid, Okla. Tbe plaintiffs were in possession of tbe premises and occupying the same as their homestead under a contract to purchase from tbe bank. Tbe oil and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Palmer Oil & Gas Co. v. ParishSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900
  2. Franklin Land Co. v. Wea Gas, Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1890

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Rich v. DonegheySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Sperry Oil & Gas Co. v. ChisholmSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Continental Supply Co. v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1945
  4. Hawkins v. CorbitSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  5. Long v. TalleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API