Long v. Talley
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Tulsa County; N. E. McNeill, Judge. Action by Pearl Talley against Elton S. Long and another to cancel contract for sale of homestead and for otther relief. Judgment for the plaintiff. Defendant Elton S. Long appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.
This action was commenced in the district court of Tulsa county by Pearl Talley, as plaintiff, against Haskell B. Talley and Elton S.'Long, as defendants. The action was to require' ner husband, defendant Talley, to pay alimony for the support of the plaintiff and her children under section 4975, Revised Laws of Oklahoma, 1910, and to subject certain real estate in the city of Tulsa to her use and control. She also asked the court to cancel a purported contract made by her husband, Haskell B. Talley, whereby he had agreed to sell to defendant Long the real estate above referred to. She…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Haddock v. HaddockSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Pettis v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Anderson v. WattSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Atherton v. AthertonSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Cressler v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Nickel v. JandaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Larson v. ColeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1948
- Japp v. Sapulpa State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- First Nat. Bank of Allen v. BurnettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- American State Bank v. LeforceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.