Lamont v. LeFevre
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Bay. (Cobb, J.) Bill to enforce a mechanic’s lien. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, C. J.
Complainant, a material-man, filed the bill in this cause against Frank Le Fevre and Almina Le Fevre, husband and wife, and Michael Daily, to enforce a mechanic’s lien for materials furnished for a hotel erected upon premises owned by Frank Le Fevre..
A contract to furnish material, erect and complete said *176hotel, was let by Le Fevre to a firm of builders named Willis & Grant, who in turn sublet a portion to one Thompson. Thompson failed to perform, and negotiations were had whereby complainant furnished material which Thompson should have furnished. The principal dispute, so far as the‘facts…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gibbs v. HanchetteMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Kirkwood v. HoxieMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Mills v. HobbsMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by25 opinions
- Smalley v. Northwestern Terra-Cotta Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Smalley v. Ashland Brown-Stone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Burton Drywall, Inc. v. KaufmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- McMonegal v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Lipschitz v. Napa Fruit Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.