Legal Opinion
Morgan v. Reasor Corp.
California Supreme Court
Decided December 12, 1968No. Sac. 7786PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.
Plaintiffs, the buyers of a house to be constructed upon their land, obtained a judgment barring the assignees of the sellers of the house from collecting certain carrying charges (the so-called time price differential) because of violations of the Unruh Act (sections 1801 through 1812 of the Civil Code). The judgment also awarded to plaintiffs their attorney’s fees and costs as well as certain incidental damages.
Recognizing the salutary purposes of the Unruh Act in requiring that consumers obtain certain specified information as to the terms of instalment contracts, and in protecting against…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Lady Washington Consolidated Co. v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Unico v. OwenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
- Commercial Credit Company v. ChildsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
- Mutual Finance Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Vasquez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Barquis v. Merchants Collection Assn.California Supreme Court · 1972
- Glaire v. La Lanne-Paris Health Spa, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1974
- King v. Central BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Leaf v. Phil Rauch, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1975
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.