Legal Opinion
United States v. Star Scientific, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided June 3, 2002No. 1:02-cv-00971PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
MOTZ, District Judge.
The Plaintiff, the United States of America, has moved to compel Star Scientific, Inc. to comply with a subpoena duces tecum issued from this .Court pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 45. The subpoena requires Star to produce documents in connection with a lawsuit the United States has filed against tobacco companies in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. See United States v. Philip Morris, Inc., No. 99-CV-02496 (D.D.C. filed Sept. 22, 1999). Star is not a party to that underlying suit. For the reasons set forth below, the motion will be…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Micro Motion, Incorporated v. Kane Steel Co., Inc., Cross/appellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- In Re: Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Byrnes v. Jetnet Corp.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1986
- Bank of Texas v. Computer Statistics, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1973
- In Re Digital Equipment Corporation E. Joseph DeanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. Philip Morris USA Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Schaaf v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2005
- Maxtena, Inc. v. MarksDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2012
- SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. Synthon Pharmaceuticals Ltd.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2002
- In Re Subpoenas Served on Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering & Goodwin Proctor LLPDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.