SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. Synthon Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ELIASON, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiffs, a group of pharmaceutical companies, sue the defendants (hereinafter called *165“Synthon”) for patent infringement. They now have filed a motion to modify a stipulated, blanket protective order entered into between the parties. The reason for the request is their desire to use the deposition transcript of a Dr. Franz VanDahlen1 (with Exhibits 2 & 4) to support their opposition to summary judgment filed in litigation pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania which involves the same ’944 patent at…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Beckman Industries, Inc. Smithkline Beckman, and Stauffer Chemical Company, Intervenors-Appellees v. International Insurance Company, Beckman Industries, Inc. Smithkline Beckman, and Monsanto Company Reichhold Limited Fmc Corporation Bridgestone/firestone, Intervenors-Appellees v. International Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Micro Motion, Incorporated v. Kane Steel Co., Inc., Cross/appellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Byrnes v. Jetnet Corp.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1986
- United States v. Star Scientific, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2002
- Parkway Gallery Furniture, Inc. v. Kittinger/Pennsylvania House Group, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Kinetic Concepts, Inc. v. Convatec Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2010
- STATE ex rel. OKLA. STATE BD. OF MEDICAL LICENSURE AND SUPERVISION v. RIVEROSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2021
- United States v. BulgerDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012
- Biovail Laboratories, Inc. v. Anchen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2006
- Brigham Young University v. Pfizer, Inc.District Court, D. Utah · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.