Legal Opinion
Maxtena, Inc. v. Marks
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided December 11, 2012No. Civil Action No. DKC 11-0945PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DEBORAH K. CHASANOW, District Judge.
Presently pending and ready for review in this contract dispute are numerous discovery *432motions filed by Plaintiff Maxtena, Inc. (“Maxtena”), Defendant Jeremy Marks (“Marks”), and several nonparty subpoena recipients. The following motions will be addressed in this Memorandum Opinion: (1) Marks’s motion to compel certain discovery responses from Maxtena (ECF No. 57); (2) Marks’s motion for sanctions (ECF No. 54, as corrected by ECF No. 69); (3) Maxtena’s motion to strike Marks’s motions to compel and for sanctions (ECF No. 63, as corrected…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- In Re the Knight Publishing Company D/B/A the Charlotte ObserverCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- Victor Stanley, Inc. v. Creative Pipe, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2010
- Victor Stanley, Inc. v. Creative Pipe, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2008
- United Oil Co. v. Parts Associates, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Med. Mut. of Ohio v. Abbvie Inc. (In re Testosterone Replacement Therapy Prods. Liab. Litig.)District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
- ALSTON v. LOCKLEARDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2022
- ATI HOLDINGS, LLC; ATHLETIC & THERAPEUTIC INSTITUTE OF NAPERVILLE, LLC; ATI PHYSICAL THERAPY, INC.; and RAY WAHL v. GILMAN & BEDIGIAN, LLC, and RAFAEL LAW, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2026
- ATI HOLDINGS, LLC; ATHLETIC & THERAPEUTIC INSTITUTE OF NAPERVILLE, LLC; ATI PHYSICAL THERAPY, INC.; and RAY WAHL v. GILMAN & BEDIGIAN, LLC, and RAFAEL LAW, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2026
- Anstead v. Virginia Mason Medical CenterDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.