Legal Opinion

A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided February 13, 1973No. C.R.D. 73-4PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rao, Judge:

This is a motion, filed on December 15, 1972, for an order which will include the statement necessary to provide the condi*338tion precedent for an application to seek leave to file an intermediate appeal to the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1541(b), as amended, from the court’s order of September 26, 1972, denying a motion to dismiss the action and/or the complaint.

The merchandise involved herein consists of brassieres and bikini pants, imported in sets. They were classified as entireties under item 378.60, TSUS, as underwear. Plaintiff claims that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Holmes v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
  2. Hancock Gross Mfg., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  3. Novelty Imports, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  4. C. L. Hutchins & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  5. Novelty Imports, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mobilite, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
  2. Kurt S. Adler, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
  3. A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API