Legal Opinion

C. L. Hutchins & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided November 19, 1971No. C.D. 4297; protest 67/25245 on rags and scrap cordagePublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nao, Judge:

This is a motion by the Government to modify an order denying its motion to dismiss the action for lack of jurisdiction, by adding a statement that a controlling question of law is involved as to which there is substantial ground for difference of opinion and that an immediate appeal may materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation.

The purpose of this procedure is to enable defendant to appeal the. said interlocutory order to the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals under 28 U.S.C. § 1541(b), as amended. That section provides:

* * * when any judge in the Customs…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Herbert Milbert v. Bison Laboratories, Inc., and the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
  2. United States v. Ray B. WoodburyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
  3. Bobolakis v. Compania Panamena Maritima San Gerassimo, S.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1958
  4. Seven-Up Company v. O-So Grape Co.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 1959
  5. Barrett v. BurtDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1966

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Flintkote Co. v. BlumenthalDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1979
  2. A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
  3. Kurt S. Adler, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
  4. Kelley v. SecretaryUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
  5. United States v. Dantzler Lumber & Export Co.United States Court of International Trade · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API