Kurt S. Adler, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Maletz, Judge:
On May 14, 1973, defendant filed a motion, pursuant to rule 4.7 (d), for a more definite statement in the form of amendments to each of 219 complaints. Plaintiffs interposed no objection to the motion and the court, accordingly, granted it on June 20, 1973. On July 18, 1973, plaintiffs filed (1) the present motion for rehearing, pursuant to rules 12.1(a) and (b), to set aside the court’s order of June 20, 1973;1 and (2) a motion for leave to take an interlocutory appeal, pursuant to rule 13.2(a), in the event the motion for rehearing to set aside the court’s order of June 20,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Berkey Technical Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
- C. L. Hutchins & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
- A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
- Mitsubishi International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
- Stahlwood Toy Mfg. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
3Cited by2 opinions
- Estee Lauder Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011
- Tubelite Architectural Products v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989