Kincaid v. Dunn
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a-judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County and from an order denying a new trial. Benjamin F. Bledsoe, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Action for damages. The complaint charged defendants with so negligently driving an automobile that it ran into and collided with plaintiff’s automobile, injuring it to his damage in the sum of three hundred and fifty dollars.
The court gave judgment for plaintiff, from which and an order denying their motion for a new trial, defendants appeal.
Appellants’ chief contention is that the evidence is insufficient to support the finding of the court that plaintiff’s automobile was damaged in the sum of $310.85. Por the purpose of ascertaining the damage, plaintiff was permitted, without objection on…
2Cited by18 opinions
- Kaufman v. TomichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Rhodes v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1921
- Kruvant v. DickermanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Menefee v. Raisch Improvement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1926
- Moore v. LevyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.