Legal Opinion

City of Tulsa v. State Industrial Court

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 14, 1967No. 41946PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKBIRD, Justice:

This is an original proceeding to review an award entered by the State Industrial Court in favor of respondent, Maldine Hyde, for death benefits under the provisions of the Oklahoma Compensation Act. Respondent Maldine Hyde, as a matter of convenience will be referred to herein as claimant and petitioner City of Tulsa as respondent, the same being the respective relation the parties bore to each other in the trial court.

Claimant Maldine Hyde is the widow of Ralph Hyde, deceased. On May 13, 1964, Hyde was employed as a police officer by the respondent City, and, while…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. EavesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  2. Armour & Co. v. WordenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  3. Ada Coca-Cola Bottling Company v. SneadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  4. Adams v. Reed Roller Bit CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  5. GT Harvey Company v. SteeleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Layton v. Yankee Caithness Joint Venture, L.P.District Court, D. Nevada · 1991
  2. Edmond Public Schools v. CookCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1992
  3. Saber Oil Co. v. SmedleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
  4. Consolidated Business v. WilliamsCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API