Legal Opinion

Layton v. Yankee Caithness Joint Venture, L.P.

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided June 21, 1991No. CV-N-89-280-HDMPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

McKIBBEN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, a group of homeowners from Pleasant Valley, Nevada, commenced this nuisance action against Yankee Caithness Joint Venture (“YCJV”) seeking damages and injunctive relief. YCJV operates a geothermal power plant several miles from Pleasant Valley. Plaintiffs claim the noise and hydrogen sulfide odor emanating from the YCJV plant constitute nuisances which have caused health problems, polluted the drinking water, diminished the value of their property, and been offensive to the senses. YCJV has moved for summary judgment on all issues.

A private nuisance…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Carita Richardson, Infant, by S. & E. Richardson, Guardians v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
  2. Jones v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. Richardson v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Miller v. JasinskiCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1986
  5. Jezowski v. City of RenoNevada Supreme Court · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In re Lipitor (Atorvastatin Calcium) Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2017
  2. Hanna v. Motiva Enterprises, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  3. Western Sunview Properties, LLC v. FedermanDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2004
  4. In re Lipitor (Atorvastatin Calcium) Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2017
  5. Bentley v. Hickam Communities LLCDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2025

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API