Legal Opinion
Harvey v. Booth Fisheries Co. of Delaware
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided October 27, 1915No. 3029PublishedCited by 9 opinions
At Law. Action by George L. Harvey against Booth Fisheries Company of Delaware and others. On demurrer to the complaint.
1Opinion of the Court
NETERER, District Judge.
The complaint in this case is based upon section 7 of the Act of July 2, 1890, 26 Stat. at Large, 209, 210, known as the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, which provides:
"Any person who shall be Injured in his business or property by any other person or corporation by reason of anything forbidden or declared to be unlawful by this act, may sue therefor in any Circuit LDistrictj Court of the "United States in the district in which the defendant resides or is found, without respect to the amount in controversy, and shall recover threefold the damages by him sustained, and the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Chattanooga Foundry & Pipe Works v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Brady v. DalySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Duffies v. DuffiesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
- State ex rel. Richey v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1906
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Electric Theater Co. v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1953
- Leonia Amusement Corp. v. Loew's Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1953
- Christensen v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.District Court, D. Utah · 1951
- Englander Motors, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961
- Reid v. Doubleday & Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.