Legal Opinion
Reid v. Doubleday & Co.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided December 30, 1952No. Civ. 6718PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KLOEB, District Judge.
This matter, comes before the Court on plaintiff’s motion to strike from- defendant’s answer, and.motion for a more definite statement.
Memoranda are filed in support of and in opposition to the motions as required by the rule.
In specification 1 of the motion to strike, plaintiff seeks to have stricken out, under Rule 12(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., the phrase “as a sub-jobber”.
Rule 8 provides, with reference to defenses :
“A party -shall state in short and plain terms his defenses to each claim asserted and shall admit or deny the averments…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- West v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Chattanooga Foundry & Pipe Works v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. FieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Pinney Dock And Transport Co. v. Penn Central Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Pinney Dock & Transport Co. v. Penn Central Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Krisel v. DuranDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Sun Theatre Corp. v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
- Leonia Amusement Corp. v. Loew's Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1953
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.