Legal Opinion
Englander Motors, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided July 17, 1961No. 14346PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEICK, Circuit Judge.
The action in the District Court was to recover treble damages under Section 4 of the Clayton Act for alleged violations of Sections 2(a) and 3 of the Robinson-Patman Act. 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 15, 13, 13a.
Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment on two grounds, namely, (1) that an action for treble damages under Section 4 of the Clayton Act cannot be brought for violations of Section 3 of the Robinson-Patman Act and (2) the action is barred by the Ohio statute of limitations. The District Court granted the motion on both grounds and dismissed the complaint. Plaintiff…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Chattanooga Foundry & Pipe Works v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Meeker & Co. v. Lehigh Valley RRSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Hoosier Cardinal Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- William E. Bufalino v. The Michigan Bell Telephone CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
- Blue Sky L. Rep. P 70,731 David B. Charney, Allen J. Kraft, Harris J. Klein and Charles N. Maybruck v. Donald D. Thomas, Ira A. Lutz and Loyd GibsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
- Thompson v. KerrDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1982
- Blue Diamond Coal Company v. United Mine Workers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.