McDonald v. State
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FORSBERG, Judge.
This is an appeal from an order denying post-conviction relief, Minn.Stat. ch. 590. Appellant’s petition challenged the trial court’s ruling on the admissibility of evidence against him, and the denial of his motion for a mistrial. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant was charged with possession of a Schedule II controlled substance, Dilaudid, and with possession with intent to sell Benzedrine, another controlled substance. He was convicted of the first offense, and acquitted of the second. He did not appeal his conviction.
Appellant was arrested on December 4, 1981. He was not…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. KnafflaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- State v. CoxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- State v. HollyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. HalvorsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- State v. MarchbanksCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- State v. OnyskoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
- State v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- State of Minnesota v. Bashir Abdullahi FarahCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014