State v. Marchbanks
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
G. BARRY ANDERSON, Judge
Appellant Juan Marchbanks (aka Rahs-aah Smith), convicted of unlawful possession of a firearm and second-degree controlled substance possession, argues that the district court abused its discretion by (1) failing to grant his motion for mistrial after a prospective juror asked whether appellant was a felon and (2) admitting a police officer’s testimony that the amount of cocaine recovered was consistent with sale. Appellant also argues that the district court abused its discretion by ordering separate sentences for the two convictions. We affirm.
FACTS
On April…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- State v. LoebachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. KennedySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- State v. GrahamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- State v. BookwalterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. KendellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. BauerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- State v. GrampreCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- State v. NetlandCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- State v. McCauleyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.