State of Minnesota v. Bashir Abdullahi Farah
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SMITH, Judge.
We affirm the district court’s pretrial order excluding eontrolled-substance evi dence because the district court, concluding that appellant State of Minnesota had sufficient notice, did not err by making a chain-of-custody evidentiary ruling before trial and did not abuse its discretion by finding the evidence inadmissible.
FACTS
On April 12, 2013, Agent Arnold Zuniga of the Freeborn County sheriff’s office and the South Central Drug Investigation Unit learned that a confidential reliable informant could arrange for him to buy one ounce of cocaine for $1,000. Agent Zuniga…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- State v. HagerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State of Minnesota v. David Lester McHanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015