Legal Opinion

State of Minnesota v. Bashir Abdullahi Farah

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 29, 2014No. A14-541PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SMITH, Judge.

We affirm the district court’s pretrial order excluding eontrolled-substance evi dence because the district court, concluding that appellant State of Minnesota had sufficient notice, did not err by making a chain-of-custody evidentiary ruling before trial and did not abuse its discretion by finding the evidence inadmissible.

FACTS

On April 12, 2013, Agent Arnold Zuniga of the Freeborn County sheriff’s office and the South Central Drug Investigation Unit learned that a confidential reliable informant could arrange for him to buy one ounce of cocaine for $1,000. Agent Zuniga…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  3. State v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  4. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  5. State v. HagerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State of Minnesota v. David Lester McHanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API