Phillips v. Cowden
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Allen M. Stearne,
This is an action in trespass for personal injuries in which the jury rendered a verdict for $100,000.00 against both defendants. Defendant^ Latham accepted the jury’s verdict; defendant Cowden filed motions for new trial and judgment n.o.v. The court below granted a new trial against both defendants and refused judgment n.ó.v. Plaintiff appeals from the grant of a new *290trial, and defendant Cowden appeals from the refusal of judgment n.o.v. In this situation we are required first to decide whether defendant’s motion for a new trial was properly granted.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kline v. Moyer and AlbertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Beal v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Biehl, Admr. v. RaffertySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Harkins v. Somerset Bus Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- St. John v. KeplerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
3Cited by9 opinions
- Corabi v. Curtis Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Cowden v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Evans v. FarmerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1963
- Jeloszewski v. SloanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Pendleton v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.