Legal Opinion

Phillips v. Cowden

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 22, 1952No. Appeals, 65 and 71PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Allen M. Stearne,

This is an action in trespass for personal injuries in which the jury rendered a verdict for $100,000.00 against both defendants. Defendant^ Latham accepted the jury’s verdict; defendant Cowden filed motions for new trial and judgment n.o.v. The court below granted a new trial against both defendants and refused judgment n.ó.v. Plaintiff appeals from the grant of a new *290trial, and defendant Cowden appeals from the refusal of judgment n.o.v. In this situation we are required first to decide whether defendant’s motion for a new trial was properly granted.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kline v. Moyer and AlbertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Beal v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. Biehl, Admr. v. RaffertySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  4. Harkins v. Somerset Bus Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. St. John v. KeplerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Corabi v. Curtis Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Cowden v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Evans v. FarmerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Jeloszewski v. SloanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  5. Pendleton v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API