Beal v. Reading Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Allen M. Stearne,
In this trespass action for personal injuries both sides have appealed. Plaintiffs’ appeal is from an order granting a new trial, following a jury’s verdict for plaintiffs. The refusal of defendant’s motion for judgment non obstante veredicto is the cause for the other appeal.
Where a defendant, as here, moves not only for a new trial but for judgment n.o.v., he places himself in rather an anomalous position. If his motion for a new trial is granted, it automatically disposes of the motion for judgment n.o.v. But this situation frequently has been before…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Jones Et Vir v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Class & Nachod Brewing Co. v. GiacobelloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Bellettiere v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Carroll v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Corabi v. Curtis Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Coker v. SM Flickinger Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Scaife Co. v. Rockwell-Standard Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Commonwealth v. PowellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Segriff v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.