Utilities Production Corp. v. Riddle
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court of Pittsburg county in favor of the defendants in error, who were the plaintiffs in the trial court, against the plaintiff in error, who was the defendant in the trial court. Hereinafter the parties will be referred to as plaintiffs and defendant.
The plaintiffs Coleman Riddle and Nancy Riddle brought an action against the defendant for the purpose of procuring the cancellation of a portion of a certain oil and gas mining lease held by the defendant. The material allegation of the petition was that the defendant had abandoned the lease as…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Indiana Oil, Gas & Development Co. v. McCrorySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Kimbley v. LuckeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Galt v. MetscherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Papoose Oil Co. v. RaineySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Hawkins v. KleinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hudspeth v. SchmelzerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Taylor v. BrindleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
- American National Bank & Trust Co. of Shawnee v. McGinnisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- Sun Oil Co. v. OswellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Gibson & Jennings, Inc. v. Amos Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.