Legal Opinion

Papoose Oil Co. v. Rainey

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 27, 1923No. 13880PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCochran, J.

This action was commenced by the defendants in error, hereinafter referred to as plaintiffs, against the plaintiff, hereinafter referred to as defendant, for the cancellation of an oil and gas lease on 40 acres of land. One of the grounds1 for cancellation was a failure to diligently develop, and on that issue the trial court found:

“That the premises involved herein have not been properly developed for oil and gas purposes with reasonable diligence by the defendant.”

The defendant assigns as error the failure of the trial court to make certain specific findings of fact in connection with the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pelham Petroleum Co. v. NorthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Briggs v. EgganSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  3. Blackwell Oil & Gas Co. v. WhitesidesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. Wapa Oil & Development Co. v. McBrideSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  5. Allen v. WildmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Fox Petroleum Co. v. BookerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. Hudspeth v. SchmelzerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. Atlantic-Pacific Oil Co. v. Gas Development Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Ramsey Petroleum Corporation v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  5. Cotner v. MundySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API