Legal Opinion

Kimbley v. Luckey

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 8, 1919No. 9002PublishedCited by 31 opinions

Error from District Court, Okmulgee County; Chas. G. Watts, Judge. Action by E. W. Kimbley, Frank King, Frank Sheedy, and W. R. Alexander against Floyd Luckey and Louis Luckey. From the judgment sustaining a demurrer to plaintiffs’ petition and dismissing their action, pjlaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtSharp, J.

Plaintiffs’ action was to recover the value of royalties on oil and gas produced on the west half of the northeast quarter" and the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of section 18, township 13 north, range 13 east, by the lessee, E. O. Lambert, and by him paid to the owners, Floyd and Louis Luckey, between the 19th day of January, 1910, and [lie Sth day of December, 1910.

'The circumstances out of which the controversy arose are as follows: On the 24th day of August, 1915, Floyd Luckey, at the time the owner of the northeast quarter of section 18, township 13 north, range 13 east,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Osborn v. Arkansas Territorial Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  2. Fairbanks v. WarrumIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. Wettengel v. GormleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  4. Campbell v. LynchWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Lynch v. DavisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Japhet v. McRaeTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  2. Pierce Oil Corporation v. SchachtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. Gypsy Oil Co. v. SchonwaldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Wright v. Carter Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. McIntire's Administrator v. BondCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API