Legal Opinion

Matter of Briscoe

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1994No. 34S00-9201-DI-46PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DISCIPLINARY ACTION

2Per curiam

The Respondent in this proceeding, David L. Briscoe, has been charged in a two-count verified complaint with engaging in conduct in violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct. In accordance with IndAdmission and Discipline Rule 23, a hearing officer was appointed, a hearing was conducted, and the hearing officer’s report has been tendered for approval by this court. Although being given notice, Respondent did not appear at the hearing. Neither party has petitioned for review of the hearing officer’s report. As more fully set forth in the opinion that follows, we find…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re CarmodyIndiana Supreme Court · 1987
  2. In re O'NeillIndiana Supreme Court · 1989

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Matter of HelmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API