In re Carmody
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DISCIPLINARY ACTION
2Per curiam
The Respondent, John T. Carmody, has been charged in a two-count Verified Complaint for Disciplinary Action with engaging in conduct which violates Disciplinary Rules 1-102(A)(5) and (6), 6-101(A)(3), 7-101(A)(2) and (3) of the Code of Professional Responsibility for Attorneys at Law. After an attempt to notify the Respondent at his last known address, constructive service was effected pursuant to Admission and Discipline Rule 23, Section 12(d) because the Respondent has failed to make his current address available to the Executive Director of the Board of Law Examiners as…
3Cited by3 opinions
- Matter of BriscoeIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
- United States v. SeefriedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- United States v. SeefriedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022